There's a difference between being a "brainless action flick," like Die Hard, and being a shitty movie, like 300.
A person getting stabbed in slow motion. That's all 300 amounts to. That's the entirety of the action. Slow motion stabbings. There's a 30 second shot of him killing 10 guys in the exact same way. And then, when it actually tries to have a story... holy fuck. How could you stand that shit? It doesn't have to be "high brow art," it has to be bearable. One scene had a character twist, an introduction of conflict, and a very lucky resolution to that conflict, all within one minute. It's like Transformers: throw enough money into special effects and hope no one realizes you put no effort into the actual filmmaking. Oh yeah, and lots of blood so people say it's a "guy movie." No. Goodfellas is a "guy movie." 300 was a movie for little boys.
Sometimes the best movies are the ones we make up...
Because it's a book about a man who doesn't know
He's about to die, and then dies.
But if a man does know he's about to die and dies anyway,
Dies willingly, knowing that he could stop it, then I mean,
Isn't that the type of man who you want to keep alive?-Zach Helm
I shall watch this movie for the action I swear, not the boobies![]()
Originally Posted by BiGuy
I don't understand this. People read waaaaay too far into movies. I go see movies to be entertained. It doesn't matter how. If it's entertaining, then I am satisfied.
It must be hard to be a film critic because you are reading way too far into movies and over analyzing everything. 300 isn't supposed to be story driven. It's supposed to be a mindless eye feast. You are not supposed to analyze it any further than that.
Movie looks fucking awesome. The art direction reminds me of the live action Casshern movie.
__________________________________________________
Your mother's a whore!Illegal immigration is not a new problem, Native Americans used to call it 'White People'.